Intense debates continue over the concepts of "standards" and "qualifications" in software testing. Can the subjective nature of human-driven software exploration and quality auditing truly be standardized? Does certification foster a potentially misleading sense of confidence, completion of skills, and even complacency? Is it possible for one organization or group to impose standardization or accreditation without the agreement or endorsement of others?

Read this Blog Also- https://www.testevolve.com/blo....g/software-testing-c

Read My Letest Blog Link Are Mention in Below -
http://postr.yruz.one/Conqueri....ng-Automated-Testing
http://bemorepanda.com/en/post....s/1705487844-the-fut

Read My Letest Blog Link Are Mention in Below -
http://postr.yruz.one/Conqueri....ng-Automated-Testing
http://bemorepanda.com/en/post....s/1705487844-the-fut

In the field of software development, conversations frequently revolve around two widely embraced methodologies: Behavior-Driven Development (BDD) and Test-Driven Development (TDD). Despite their shared emphasis on enhancing software quality through testing, these two approaches differ significantly in their principles and practices.

Read THIS Blog - http://www.addnewarticle.com/t....echnology/bdd-vs-tdd

http://www.29chat.com/leeannamarshall877
http://git.disroot.org/leeanna_marsh877
http://armorama.com/profile/leeannamarshall877
http://www.hockeynhlforum.com/leeannamarshall877
http://goosbi.com/blackbook/leeannamarshall877